The Obama Watch
The Man Who Despises America, By Mark Hyman on 11.11.09 @ 6:09AM
The very next paragraph is going to make the nut jobs on the far left excitable beyond belief. I am not referring to all Democrats or even a majority of liberals. I am singling out the "they've-lost-all-touch-with-reality" crowd. This includes Media Matters for America led by the admitted hit-and-run, drunk-driving serial liar. The group includes the unshaven, bathrobe-clad unemployed who live in their mother's basement and are devout followers of MoveOn.Org. It is also the bitter, aging spinster working at the New York Times, the morbidly obese documentary film maker, and cable TV news' resident drama queen who hosts MSNBC's Countdown. They are about to simultaneously suffer from brain aneurisms. So without further delay, I'll say it.
Barack Obama despises America.
When people who voted for Obama in 2008 -- including registered Democrats -- start speaking in normal conversational voices at dinner parties, neighborhood gatherings and PTA meetings that the over-inflated ego from Chicago has it "in for America," then it's clear most reasonable people have reached the same conclusion.
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Thursday, November 12, 2009
NEA Recommends Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" as a Teaching Aid
From Gatwaypundit.com
Thursday, November 12, 2009, 12:47 PM, Jim Hoft
Here is part of the NEA’s review of Saul Alinsky’s radical writings:
“Radicals precipitate the social crisis by action – by using power. Liberals may then timidly follow along or else, as in most cases, be swept forward along the course set by Radicals, but all because of forces unloosed by Radical action. They are forced to positive action only in spite of their desires
* “The American Radical will fight privilege and power whether it be inherited or acquired by any small group, whether it be political or financial or organized creed.
* “He curses a caste system which he recognizes despite all patriotic denials
* “He will fight conservatives whether they are business or labor leaders.
* “He will fight any concentration of power hostile to a broad, popular democracy, whether he finds it in financial circles or in politics.
* “The Radical recognizes that constant dissension and conflict is and has been the fire under the boiler of democracy. He firmly believes in that brave saying of a brave people, “Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!”
* “The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people.
* “That is the reason why Radicals, although frequently embarking upon revolutions, have rarely resorted to personal terrorism.”
Alinsky practiced what he preached. He said, “Tactics means doing what you can with what you have … tactics is the art of how to take and how to give.” Sounds like just the think you want your local teachers to bring into the classroom, huh?
Unbelievable.
Thursday, November 12, 2009, 12:47 PM, Jim Hoft
Here is part of the NEA’s review of Saul Alinsky’s radical writings:
“Radicals precipitate the social crisis by action – by using power. Liberals may then timidly follow along or else, as in most cases, be swept forward along the course set by Radicals, but all because of forces unloosed by Radical action. They are forced to positive action only in spite of their desires
* “The American Radical will fight privilege and power whether it be inherited or acquired by any small group, whether it be political or financial or organized creed.
* “He curses a caste system which he recognizes despite all patriotic denials
* “He will fight conservatives whether they are business or labor leaders.
* “He will fight any concentration of power hostile to a broad, popular democracy, whether he finds it in financial circles or in politics.
* “The Radical recognizes that constant dissension and conflict is and has been the fire under the boiler of democracy. He firmly believes in that brave saying of a brave people, “Better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!”
* “The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people.
* “That is the reason why Radicals, although frequently embarking upon revolutions, have rarely resorted to personal terrorism.”
Alinsky practiced what he preached. He said, “Tactics means doing what you can with what you have … tactics is the art of how to take and how to give.” Sounds like just the think you want your local teachers to bring into the classroom, huh?
Unbelievable.
Dare to Call it Terrorism
Dare to Call It Terrorism By Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review Online
The FBI will not admit that what happened in Texas is part of the jihad.
So it turns out that the worst Islamist terrorist strike since 9/11 — an attack that killed twice as many Americans as were slain in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing — was not a terrorist attack at all. Just ask the FBI.
The initial hurried reports of thirteen people (including twelve U.S. soldiers) murdered, and dozens of others wounded, were just coming in. A pained Diane Sawyer was wishing aloud that Nidal Malik Hasan were named “Smith.” Her colleagues in what now passes for mainstream journalism were risibly theorizing that post-traumatic stress disorder must have snapped this non-combat Army psychiatrist — one who’d screamed “Allahu akbar!” while mowing down U.S. soldiers about to deploy to a Muslim country for a war he’d made no secret of deploring; one whose only battlefield experience was the massacre he’d just committed against unarmed men and women in a Fort Hood training center.
Then, like the cavalry, the FBI came riding to the PC rescue. The Federal Bureau of Let’s Skip the Investigation pronounced that the killing was not terrorism. Forget about Islamic (or at least Islamist) terrorism. This mass murder wasn’t even terrorism.
The FBI will not admit that what happened in Texas is part of the jihad.
So it turns out that the worst Islamist terrorist strike since 9/11 — an attack that killed twice as many Americans as were slain in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing — was not a terrorist attack at all. Just ask the FBI.
The initial hurried reports of thirteen people (including twelve U.S. soldiers) murdered, and dozens of others wounded, were just coming in. A pained Diane Sawyer was wishing aloud that Nidal Malik Hasan were named “Smith.” Her colleagues in what now passes for mainstream journalism were risibly theorizing that post-traumatic stress disorder must have snapped this non-combat Army psychiatrist — one who’d screamed “Allahu akbar!” while mowing down U.S. soldiers about to deploy to a Muslim country for a war he’d made no secret of deploring; one whose only battlefield experience was the massacre he’d just committed against unarmed men and women in a Fort Hood training center.
Then, like the cavalry, the FBI came riding to the PC rescue. The Federal Bureau of Let’s Skip the Investigation pronounced that the killing was not terrorism. Forget about Islamic (or at least Islamist) terrorism. This mass murder wasn’t even terrorism.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Politicians Have Become Political Terrorists
Reid has put the House bill on the Senate calendar for next Tuesday, this in response to (Bill) Clinton's urging to do something, anything, now, then add (ADD!!!) to it later.
With the Dems willingness to insure passage of this new, massive entitlement, politicians have stepped over the line and become political terrorists, willing to die (politically) for their cause.
With the Dems willingness to insure passage of this new, massive entitlement, politicians have stepped over the line and become political terrorists, willing to die (politically) for their cause.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
The Beginning of the End?
Fox News just headlined the House bill passage as, "Historic" in it's While You Slept segment.
I'm in Tampa, headed for the Packers - Bucs game this afternoon, and am sure the guests in the rooms next to mine could hear me yell, in response to Fox' characterization, "Unconstitutional, socialist, draconian, illegal, unsustainable, idiotic." And more that I can't remember now, I'm so angry.
Tried to contact Cao's (R {?!} - LA) office last night, after his traiterous vote -- that allowed the House "Leadership" to smirkingly note that the Bill was bipartisan -- with one (so-called) republican vote. His voicemail system would not record a message and his email link was conveniently disabled. But Cao's statement asserted that he had received promises from president Obama. Well of course that makes his vote okay. Because we all know Obama keeps his promises. Does not obfuscate. Has the best interests of the Nation at heart. We could see that in his remarks immediately after the Ft. Hood shooting.
We were on the charter bus, on the way home from the Thursday Rally at the Capitol, when it was reported that Obama would address the Nation at 5 p.m. Cut to the president. And we all sat in stunned silence at first, as we heard him banter with the audience at the Indian affairs conference. Then we looked at each other in disbelief at his disconnect.
I'm in Tampa, headed for the Packers - Bucs game this afternoon, and am sure the guests in the rooms next to mine could hear me yell, in response to Fox' characterization, "Unconstitutional, socialist, draconian, illegal, unsustainable, idiotic." And more that I can't remember now, I'm so angry.
Tried to contact Cao's (R {?!} - LA) office last night, after his traiterous vote -- that allowed the House "Leadership" to smirkingly note that the Bill was bipartisan -- with one (so-called) republican vote. His voicemail system would not record a message and his email link was conveniently disabled. But Cao's statement asserted that he had received promises from president Obama. Well of course that makes his vote okay. Because we all know Obama keeps his promises. Does not obfuscate. Has the best interests of the Nation at heart. We could see that in his remarks immediately after the Ft. Hood shooting.
We were on the charter bus, on the way home from the Thursday Rally at the Capitol, when it was reported that Obama would address the Nation at 5 p.m. Cut to the president. And we all sat in stunned silence at first, as we heard him banter with the audience at the Indian affairs conference. Then we looked at each other in disbelief at his disconnect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)